ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2026
Pattern and prognosis of perioperative deep vein thrombosis after hip fracture: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patients undergoing hip fracture surgery are at high risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) despite standard prophylaxis due to advanced age, surgery or the fracture itself, and immobilization. We investigated the incidence, pattern, and clinical course of DVT in this population. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent hip fracture surgery at a single institute were included. Lower extremity vein duplex ultrasonography (DUS) was performed preoperatively and again on postoperative day 7. Pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis were applied. Treatment-indicated DVT (TI-DVT) was defined as proximal DVT or isolated distal DVT (IDDVT) with a large thrombus burden (TI-IDDVT). Results: Among 154 patients, 34 (22.1%) had preoperative DVT. Twelve patients had TI-DVT (11 TI-IDDVT) and were excluded from further analysis. In the remaining 142 patients, 39 (27.4%) postoperative DVTs were diagnosed, including 19 (13.3%) TI-DVT. Of these, 3 were proximal DVT and 16 were TI-IDDVT. The multivariate analysis identified operation time and the presence of preoperative IDDVT as risk factors for postoperative TI-DVT. The majority of DVT cases were IDDVT, and we further analyzed the prognosis of IDDVT before and after surgery. Twenty-two non-TI-IDDVT cases were identified in preoperative DUS, half of which became TI-DVT after surgery. Conclusion: Most cases of perioperative DVT after hip fracture occurred as IDDVT. Half of these cases progressed to clinically significant DVT. Preoperative IDDVT represents an important predictor of postoperative TI-DVT. Therefore, preoperative DUS needs to be considered in very high-risk patients to allow earlier identification and timely management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.