ArticleNeurobiology of stress2026
Network activation and its association with perceived stress underlie performance under stressful high demand.
Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This fMRI study examined the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive performance under stress, with a focus on individual differences in this capacity. Using an Ecological Multitasking under Stress (EMTS) paradigm, 50 healthy males performed a dual task combining executive function and flight navigation across five levels of task demand. The task was performed twice - with or without an additional stressor unrelated to task demand, consisting of social evaluation and aversive sirens. Subjective distress and autonomic measures were recorded throughout the task, confirming the effectiveness of the stress manipulation. Behavioral results showed that both stress and task demand significantly hampered performance accuracy and speed and increased subjective distress. Neural activation increased with task demand in the executive control network (ECN) and default mode network (DMN), whereas additional stress selectively increased activation in the salience network. Higher task demand across runs was also associated with enhanced ECN-DMN anticorrelation, indicating reduced functional integration between these networks. Notably, at the highest task-demand level under stress, perceived stress predicted performance decline and mediated the association between greater ECN activation and poorer executive performance. These findings further highlight a potential mechanism through which subjective distress may impair performance, whereby increased ECN engagement under conditions of high demand and stress may reflect inefficient cognitive control. This work may inform the development of brain-guided interventions to improve coping with high cognitive demands under stress.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.