ReviewThe journal of climate change and health
Mental health outcomes relating to climate-sensitive extreme weather events: A scoping review of measures of mental health impact.
Review in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change is contributing to an increase in frequency and severity of extreme weather events (EWEs), which have a sizable impact on mental health and wellbeing. We sought to comprehensively synthesize measures of mental health impact used in the literature following EWEs. Materials and methods: This scoping review searched eight databases from 2017 to September 2024 to identify primary research studies that measured and reported mental health outcomes following EWEs. We categorized findings to describe a) which EWEs were most heavily studied, b) which mental health outcomes appeared more or less frequently, c) which measures of mental health impact were employed, and d) evidence gaps. Results: We screened 3,689 studies and included 154 studies from 29 countries, 15 (51.7%) of which were low- and middle-income countries. Studies reporting mental health outcomes were most commonly investigating the impact of 11 types of EWEs. We identified 188 mental health outcomes and 130 measures of mental health impact. Mental health outcomes were most commonly evaluated in studies investigating the impact of floods (n = 41), extreme heat/heatwaves (n = 32) and wildfires (n = 28). The most frequently evaluated mental health outcomes were post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 62), depression (n = 39) and anxiety (n = 27). The most commonly used measure of mental health impact was International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes. Conclusion: This scoping review provides a global overview of current reporting practices and supports the need for standardization to enable global comparisons and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.