Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741694›Full record

ReviewThe journal of climate change and health

Mental health outcomes relating to climate-sensitive extreme weather events: A scoping review of measures of mental health impact.

Denise Thomson, Meghan Sebastianski, Katie O'Hearn, Megan Nuspl, Sol Bobier, Sami Aftab Abdul, Matt Pearce, Vijendra Ingole, Myer Glickman, Richard J Webster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Denise ThomsonUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Meghan SebastianskiCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Katie O'HearnCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Megan NusplCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Sol BobierCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Sami Aftab AbdulCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Matt PearceClimate and Health Team, Office for National Statistics (ONS), Newport, United Kingdom.
Vijendra IngoleClimate and Health Team, Office for National Statistics (ONS), Newport, United Kingdom.
Myer GlickmanClimate and Health Team, Office for National Statistics (ONS), Newport, United Kingdom.
Richard J WebsterCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Climate change is contributing to an increase in frequency and severity of extreme weather events (EWEs), which have a sizable impact on mental health and wellbeing. We sought to comprehensively synthesize measures of mental health impact used in the literature following EWEs. Materials and methods: This scoping review searched eight databases from 2017 to September 2024 to identify primary research studies that measured and reported mental health outcomes following EWEs. We categorized findings to describe a) which EWEs were most heavily studied, b) which mental health outcomes appeared more or less frequently, c) which measures of mental health impact were employed, and d) evidence gaps. Results: We screened 3,689 studies and included 154 studies from 29 countries, 15 (51.7%) of which were low- and middle-income countries. Studies reporting mental health outcomes were most commonly investigating the impact of 11 types of EWEs. We identified 188 mental health outcomes and 130 measures of mental health impact. Mental health outcomes were most commonly evaluated in studies investigating the impact of floods (n = 41), extreme heat/heatwaves (n = 32) and wildfires (n = 28). The most frequently evaluated mental health outcomes were post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 62), depression (n = 39) and anxiety (n = 27). The most commonly used measure of mental health impact was International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes. Conclusion: This scoping review provides a global overview of current reporting practices and supports the need for standardization to enable global comparisons and decision-making.

Indexed as

Climate changeExtreme weather eventsMental healthMental health impactMental health outcomesOfficial statistics

Identifiers

PMID42741694
PMCPMC13573736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.