Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741674›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2026

So You Want to Teach a Field-Based Course: A Practical Toolkit for Teaching Teams.

L M Arcila Hernández, A R Payne, N J Kaplanis, A L Borker, R R Dunkin, L M Alissa, L Balachandran, H A Bhatti, M Carr, D A Croll and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

L M Arcila HernándezDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1662-0223
A R PayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6107-4252
N J KaplanisDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9882-5796
A L BorkerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9583-5091
R R DunkinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3317-0941
L M AlissaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-2775
L BalachandranDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9281-6182
H A BhattiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1903-2227
M CarrDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9711-4669
D A CrollDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3211-1667
G DaytonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.
G S GilbertDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5195-9903
E A HowardDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2856-0338
P KoubaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7272-4090
K KroekerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.
C LayDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.
H LeonardDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1252-0200
A MartínezDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.
R MehtaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-1615
T J MillerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.
I M ParkerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-1827
M PfauDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7464-1937
E S ZavaletaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-6492
R S BeltranDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-1105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field-based courses can be effective interventions in higher education but pose unique challenges. Instructors and teaching assistants (teaching teams) of field-based courses can use evidence-based course design to recruit, retain, and renew interest in life science fields while maximizing positive student experiences and outcomes. Yet, instructors and teaching assistants designing field-based courses in the life sciences lack an accessible, practitioner-focused synthesis of critical practices and tools for effective entry into this specialized form of teaching. We collected information about field-based teaching practices from educators at a four-year undergraduate research institution and hosted a collaborative summit with discussions focused around participants' lived experiences with field-based teaching to synthesize emergent themes. Additionally, summit moderators and participants acknowledged the importance of evidence-based teaching and pedagogical practices in field-based teaching. Because field-based courses require specialized teaching and leadership skills, we concluded that teaching teams should be trained in five critical practices of intentional course design and preparation: 1) providing context, 2) emphasizing community well-being, 3) preparing logistics, 4) developing interpersonal & communication skills, and 5) applying inclusive pedagogy strategies. Here, we discuss the use of these 5 critical practices in course design and we provide 10 inclusive pedagogical tools that can support positive student outcomes in field-based courses, including community building and support for project development and completion. We also emphasize the importance of support and teaching training for teaching teams of field-based experiences to improve student learning and community building outcomes in life science education.

Identifiers

PMID42741674
PMCPMC13573308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.