ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2026
So You Want to Teach a Field-Based Course: A Practical Toolkit for Teaching Teams.
Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Field-based courses can be effective interventions in higher education but pose unique challenges. Instructors and teaching assistants (teaching teams) of field-based courses can use evidence-based course design to recruit, retain, and renew interest in life science fields while maximizing positive student experiences and outcomes. Yet, instructors and teaching assistants designing field-based courses in the life sciences lack an accessible, practitioner-focused synthesis of critical practices and tools for effective entry into this specialized form of teaching. We collected information about field-based teaching practices from educators at a four-year undergraduate research institution and hosted a collaborative summit with discussions focused around participants' lived experiences with field-based teaching to synthesize emergent themes. Additionally, summit moderators and participants acknowledged the importance of evidence-based teaching and pedagogical practices in field-based teaching. Because field-based courses require specialized teaching and leadership skills, we concluded that teaching teams should be trained in five critical practices of intentional course design and preparation: 1) providing context, 2) emphasizing community well-being, 3) preparing logistics, 4) developing interpersonal & communication skills, and 5) applying inclusive pedagogy strategies. Here, we discuss the use of these 5 critical practices in course design and we provide 10 inclusive pedagogical tools that can support positive student outcomes in field-based courses, including community building and support for project development and completion. We also emphasize the importance of support and teaching training for teaching teams of field-based experiences to improve student learning and community building outcomes in life science education.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.