ArticleISME communications2026
Unraveling the diversity, function, and virus-host interactions of archaeal proviruses.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Archaea, the third domain of life, play critical roles in global biogeochemical cycles. However, archaeal proviruses integrated into host genomes remain largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we conducted a large-scale mining of genomes spanning all presently known 21 archaeal phyla for their proviruses. We identified 770 archaeal proviruses across 12 archaeal phyla and 84 families, which clustered into 655 viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs). Among these, 86.1% of the vOTUs were novel at the species level, and 69.3% could not be classified at the family level, substantially expanding the known diversity of archaeal viruses. Additionally, phylogenomic analysis supported the proposal of 16 putative novel viral families, further extending the current taxonomy landscape of archaeal viruses. Notably, 21.8% of the identified proviruses were predicted to adopt a lytic lifestyle, suggesting that these proviruses may retain the capacity to enter the lytic cycle under appropriate conditions. Host prediction indicated only 14 out of the 655 vOTUs might have potential across-lineage infection abilities. We detected 63 anti-defense genes encoded by 61 provirus genomes, such as anti-CRISPR and anti-RM, suggesting an ongoing evolutionary arms race between hosts and proviruses. However, only 10 auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) were identified, suggesting a limited impact of proviruses in the modulation of host metabolism through AMGs. This study establishes a systematic global genomic atlas of archaeal proviruses, advancing our understanding of their distribution and diversity while providing a foundation for future research into how proviruses regulate archaeal metabolism and ecosystem functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.