Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741650›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2026

Development and evaluation of clinical models based on ultrasound, serum CA153 and molecular subtype in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Ming-Yue Du, Shu-E Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ming-Yue DuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China.
Shu-E ZengDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a threat to health, and reliable predictors for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) efficacy remain limited. The aim of the present study was to develop a clinical model that combines ultrasonography with clinical and pathological characteristics to predict the effectiveness of NAC in patients with breast cancer prior to surgery. The present retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed primary breast cancer who underwent NAC followed by surgery based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly allocated to a test and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Clinical data, comprehensive pathological reports and ultrasound imaging features were collected from the Hospital Information System of Hubei Cancer Hospital (Wuhan, China). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictive factors, with significance set at a bilateral P<0.05. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the performance of the model. The present study included 323 female patients with breast cancer. Univariate analysis indicated significant differences in tumor diameter changes, mass margin and posterior echo patterns (classified as shadow, enhancement or no posterior features), change in serum carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) levels, clinical N stage (classified as cN0-cN3), hormone receptor expression, Ki-67 levels and molecular type between the pathological complete response (pCR) and pathological incomplete response (non-pCR) group. Multivariate analysis identified margin, molecular subtype, changes in tumor diameter and serum CA153 levels as significant predictors included in the final model (P<0.05). Furthermore, the present study model was validated in the validation set. The area under the curve for the predictive model in test set was 0.823 (95% confidence interval, 0.765-0.881), while in the validation set, it was 0.884 (95% confidence interval, 0.816-0.953). The integrated model, which incorporated ultrasound, serum CA153 levels and molecular subtypes, demonstrated notable potential for preoperative assessment of NAC efficacy in the future.

Indexed as

breast cancerCA153neoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responseultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42741650
PMCPMC13573283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.