ArticleERJ open research2026
Can laryngeal ultrasound detect laryngeal movements during mechanically assisted cough?
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is used to augment ineffective cough, but treatment efficacy depends on appropriate upper airway response. Transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TFL) is the reference standard for assessing laryngeal responses, but is invasive. This study evaluated whether laryngeal ultrasonography (US) can assess laryngeal responses during MI-E. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, healthy volunteers underwent MI-E with both passive and active cough efforts, while TFL and US were performed simultaneously. Laryngeal US was applied using anterior and lateral approaches. Recordings were analysed retrospectively frame-by-frame by two blinded raters. Assessability was defined as appropriate visualisation of the vocal folds or aryepiglottic folds. Visualisation success rates and concordance between laryngeal US and TFL findings were calculated across pre-specified MI-E cycles. Inter-rater reliability for US interpretation was assessed in a subset. Results: 30 adult participants and 875 MI-E cycles were included. At least one laryngeal US approach yielded assessable data in all participants, with lower assessability in males. Across MI-E cycles, visualisation success rates were higher for TFL than for laryngeal US (93.5% Conclusion: This exploratory study suggests that laryngeal US may offer a feasible noninvasive approach to assess laryngeal responses during MI-E, but TFL remains the reference standard. Further validation in patient populations is required.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.