ReviewEuropean journal of midwifery2026
Perinatal depression management: A narrative review of guidelines and recommendations in chosen European countries.
Review in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perinatal depression (PND) is a mood disorder occurring during pregnancy or within a year after childbirth, affecting up to 12% of women. Given its prevalence and burden, effective national strategies for screening and treatment are essential for its mitigation. This is a narrative review that examines current approaches to managing PND across fifteen European countries with a focus on the availability of national guidelines for screening in order to identify gaps in maternal mental health and recommend feasible solutions based on examples from countries implementing effective programs. The guidelines were identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, general web search engines, and websites of national healthcare institutions by two independent reviewers conducting the search. Guidelines were included only if they were officially issued or endorsed by national authorities, applied nationwide, and provided specific procedures and tools for screening. Among the fifteen countries examined, only four had national guidelines addressing both screening and treatment, and two had guidelines focused solely on treatment. Our evidence also indicates growing interest in PND, with several countries enhancing parental mental healthcare through pilot initiatives. International programs like the EU's Riseup-PPD and the PATH project sought to strengthen perinatal mental healthcare by supporting healthcare professionals and researchers. Despite the lack of national guidelines in some countries, NGOs have created comprehensive materials and national versions of screening tools. Stronger engagement from national health authorities is essential to ensure women receive adequate, timely care. Obligatory, standardized screening must be implemented alongside training for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.