Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741549›Full record

ArticleInterventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)2026

Feasibility of Real-time Artificial Intelligence-based Language Translation for Bilingual Informed Consent in Interventional Radiology:An Australian Proof-of-concept.

Goran Mitreski, Philip Chan, Cephas Tamburayi Kamba, Nathan Ng, David Duong, Rose Thomas, Jyothirmayi Velaga, Miranda Siemienowicz, Hong Kuan Kok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Goran MitreskiDepartment of Radiology, Northern Imaging Victoria, Australia.
Philip ChanDepartment of Radiology, Northern Imaging Victoria, Australia.
Cephas Tamburayi KambaDepartment of Radiology, Northern Imaging Victoria, Australia.
Nathan NgDepartment of Radiology, Northern Imaging Victoria, Australia.
David DuongDepartment of Radiology, Northern Imaging Victoria, Australia.
Rose ThomasInterventional Radiology Service, Northern Health, Australia.
Jyothirmayi VelagaDepartment of Radiology, St Vincents Health, Australia.
Miranda SiemienowiczDepartment of Radiology, Northern Imaging Victoria, Australia.
Hong Kuan KokDepartment of Radiology, Northern Imaging Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Language barriers in healthcare lead to miscommunication, reduced comprehension, and adverse outcomes. Professional medical interpreters are the gold standard, but are often unavailable for interventional radiology consent discussions. Recent advances in large language models such as GPT-4o have shown high accuracy in multilingual tasks. We conducted a proof-of-concept internal validation of GPT-4o as a live bilingual translation tool in interventional radiology consent simulations across nine languages. Material and Methods: Thirty-six simulated consent sessions were conducted across nine languages - Results: Across 36 sessions, mean scores were 56.2 ± 6.3 (86.5% of maximum). Acceptability (≥50) was achieved in 31/36 sessions (86.1%). Seven languages (Mandarin, Macedonian, Polish, Tamil, Malay, Afrikaans, and Vietnamese) consistently exceeded the threshold, while Cantonese (mean ~40/65) and Shona (mean ~42/65) lagged. Translation speed (time to output) averaged 4.8/5 across all languages. Conclusions: GPT-4o achieved high translation quality across multiple interventional radiology consent simulations, demonstrating the feasibility of real-time artificial intelligence interpretation for many languages. However, performance was language-dependent; certain languages (Cantonese and Shona) remained sub-optimal and merit human-interpreter supervision. These findings represent a platform-specific proof-of-concept evaluation rather than validation of artificial intelligence-based medical translation more broadly.

Indexed as

AI language translationbilingual simulationinformed consentinterventional radiology

Identifiers

PMID42741549
PMCPMC13572924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.