ArticleInterventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)2026
Feasibility of Real-time Artificial Intelligence-based Language Translation for Bilingual Informed Consent in Interventional Radiology:An Australian Proof-of-concept.
Article in Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Language barriers in healthcare lead to miscommunication, reduced comprehension, and adverse outcomes. Professional medical interpreters are the gold standard, but are often unavailable for interventional radiology consent discussions. Recent advances in large language models such as GPT-4o have shown high accuracy in multilingual tasks. We conducted a proof-of-concept internal validation of GPT-4o as a live bilingual translation tool in interventional radiology consent simulations across nine languages. Material and Methods: Thirty-six simulated consent sessions were conducted across nine languages - Results: Across 36 sessions, mean scores were 56.2 ± 6.3 (86.5% of maximum). Acceptability (≥50) was achieved in 31/36 sessions (86.1%). Seven languages (Mandarin, Macedonian, Polish, Tamil, Malay, Afrikaans, and Vietnamese) consistently exceeded the threshold, while Cantonese (mean ~40/65) and Shona (mean ~42/65) lagged. Translation speed (time to output) averaged 4.8/5 across all languages. Conclusions: GPT-4o achieved high translation quality across multiple interventional radiology consent simulations, demonstrating the feasibility of real-time artificial intelligence interpretation for many languages. However, performance was language-dependent; certain languages (Cantonese and Shona) remained sub-optimal and merit human-interpreter supervision. These findings represent a platform-specific proof-of-concept evaluation rather than validation of artificial intelligence-based medical translation more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.