Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741534›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Beyond the Scalpel: A Cross-Sectional Study of Psychological Well-Being and Quality of Life in Women With a History of Cosmetic Surgery, Surgical Candidates, and a Comparison Group.

Azita Fathnezhad-Kazemi, Asal Rahbar Zeraati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Azita Fathnezhad-KazemiDepartment of Midwifery, TaMS.C. Islamic Azad University Tabriz Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-9892
Asal Rahbar ZeraatiDepartment of Midwifery, TaMS.C. Islamic Azad University Tabriz Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Cosmetic surgery is increasingly performed worldwide and is often sought to address concerns related to body image, which may influence psychological well-being and quality of life. This study aimed to compare quality of life, psychological well-being, body appreciation, and body image concerns among women with a history of cosmetic surgery, cosmetic surgery candidates, and a comparison group. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 375 women in Tabriz, Iran. Participants were allocated into three groups: women with a history of cosmetic surgery, women who were candidates for cosmetic surgery, and a comparison group. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS), and the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's post hoc test, Pearson's correlation, and multiple linear regression. Results: The mean scores for quality of life, general health, body appreciation, and body image concern were 56.18, 27.58, 50.25, and 41.11, respectively. Significant differences were observed among the three groups in quality of life ( Conclusion: Women with a history of cosmetic surgery reported a more favorable quality of life, body appreciation, body image concerns, and psychological well-being than cosmetic surgery candidates and women in the comparison group. Routine psychological assessment and careful evaluation of patients' motivations before cosmetic surgery may facilitate informed clinical decision-making and appropriate patient selection.

Indexed as

appreciationbody imagecosmetic surgeryfearpsychologicalquality of life

Identifiers

PMID42741534
PMCPMC13572902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.