Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741511›Full record

ArticleJBMR plus2026

Phantomless calibration of glenoid trabecular bone density: improved accuracy using age-stratified reference tissue densities.

Maximilian Modelhart, Dennis C Agbanyim, Davide Cester, Philipp Moroder, Stephen J Ferguson, Eva C Herbst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBMR plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maximilian ModelhartParacelsus Medical University (PMU), 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6308-738X
Dennis C AgbanyimDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7361-1693
Davide CesterInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-6127
Philipp MoroderDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-9926
Stephen J FergusonDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0650-5889
Eva C HerbstDepartment of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-9695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of glenoid trabecular bone quality is important for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, as the density of the glenoid bone is likely to influence implant stability. Routine CT scans show promise for quantitative bone density assessments, but CT-based calibration typically involves scanning a phantom, which limits its application in clinical practice and in retrospective research studies. Here, we developed and validated a phantomless BMD measurement technique to evaluate glenoid trabecular bone density (mg/cc) using clinical shoulder CT scans of 88 patients (48 males, 40 females; mean age: 53 years). Air, fat, and muscle tissue were used as internal density references to develop patient-specific calibration functions for glenoid BMD estimation. The phantomless calibration was validated by comparison with an asynchronous phantom-based calibration using the European Spine Phantom. A Bland-Altman analysis yielded a mean difference of 0.37 mg/cc (95% CI: [-1.39, 2.14] mg/cc) between the two methods. Further improvement in internal calibration accuracy was achieved by implementing an age-stratified approach (two age groups; cut-off 55 years) to account for age-related declines in muscle density. With age stratification of reference tissue densities, the mean difference between internal and phantom-based calibration was reduced to 0.20 mg/cc (95% CI: [-1.38, 1.78] mg/cc). The proposed phantomless calibration approach provides a robust and clinically feasible method to evaluate glenoid trabecular bone density in both research and clinical applications. Moreover, the results highlight the importance of considering patient-specific variations in shoulder muscle density to ensure accurate internal calibration.

Indexed as

age stratificationdensity variation in reference tissuefatty infiltrationglenoid bone densityphantomless calibrationquantitative CT

Identifiers

PMID42741511
PMCPMC13574282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.