ArticleHealth science reports2026
Identifying Key Determinants of Fertility Among Women in Bangladesh Using Machine Learning Tools: Evidence From the BDHS 2022.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Fertility is a fundamental demographic indicator with important implications. Identifying the characteristics associated with different fertility levels and developing reliable predictive models may provide valuable evidence for population and reproductive health planning. This study aimed to examine the factors associated with fertility levels among Bangladeshi women and to compare the predictive performance of multiple machine-learning models. Methods: Data were obtained from the nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2022. The analysis included women aged 15-49 years, with fertility categorized into three groups: no children, 1-3 children, and 4 or more children. After excluding observations with missing information on variables of interest, 9382 women were retained for the descriptive and bivariate analyses. Associations between fertility level and selected predictors were assessed using Rao-Scott design-adjusted chi-square tests. For predictive modeling, nine classification algorithms were evaluated. An 80:20 stratified train-test split and stratified five-fold cross-validation were employed, with preprocessing and SMOTE conducted within the resampling framework. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, Cohen's kappa, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), mean log loss, precision, recall, and F1-score. Feature importance was subsequently examined for the best-performing ensemble models. Results: Fertility level was significantly associated with nearly all examined characteristics except the sex of the household head. Key differences were observed by education, wealth, age at first marriage, child-death experience, reproductive preferences, and contraceptive use. LightGBM, XGBoost, and Random Forest showed the best predictive performance. LightGBM achieved the highest F1-score (0.80) and lowest log loss (0.46). Feature-importance analysis consistently highlighted husband's desire for children, child-death experience, contraceptive use, ideal number of children, husband's education, household size, and media exposure as important predictors. Conclusion: Fertility classification in Bangladesh is strongly associated with reproductive preferences, socioeconomic conditions, and demographic characteristics. LightGBM, XGBoost, and Random Forest demonstrated superior predictive performance, highlighting the potential of ensemble machine-learning approaches for identifying important fertility-related factors and supporting evidence-based population and reproductive health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.