Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741495›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Low Nest Success of Black-Legged Kittiwakes (

Patrick J C White, Hannah Humphreys, Jill M Grozier, Jenna R Lane, Alexander M Willey, Annalise Bokenkamp, Nils H Schoefer, Sophie J Wilson, Ross J Rutherford, Liza Cole and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Patrick J C WhiteCentre for Conservation & Restoration Science Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9349-8447
Hannah HumphreysSchool of Applied Sciences Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Jill M GrozierSchool of Applied Sciences Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Jenna R LaneCentre for Conservation & Restoration Science Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Alexander M WilleySchool of Applied Sciences Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Annalise BokenkampSchool of Applied Sciences Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Nils H SchoeferCentre for Conservation & Restoration Science Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Sophie J WilsonSchool of Applied Sciences Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Ross J RutherfordSchool of Applied Sciences Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8041-5101
Liza ColeNational Trust for Scotland St Abbs UK.
Ciaran HatsellNational Trust for Scotland St Abbs UK.
Rachel BonniciNational Trust for Scotland St Abbs UK.
Ellie OwenNational Trust for Scotland St Abbs UK.
Michelle FrostCentre for Conservation & Restoration Science Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Sue LewisCentre for Conservation & Restoration Science Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.
Karen DieleCentre for Conservation & Restoration Science Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seabirds face a range of pressures including rising sea temperatures, declining food availability, offshore renewables and disturbances at their onshore nesting colonies. Developers of marine renewables often seek to implement compensatory measures to offset risk and enhance productivity through targeted management interventions, including reduction in disturbance. To evaluate whether such interventions could be effective at a mainland protected area in Scotland (St Abb's Head), we analysed a dataset of > 1400 kittiwake nests monitored across nine plots over 7 years (2015-19 and 2022-23) to (a) assess potential impacts of increasing numbers of walkers on cliff tops and boats operating close inshore on nest success and number of chicks fledged, and (b) assess whether productivity is sufficient to sustain the local population. We found no strong evidence that people or boat activity negatively affected nest success or number of chicks fledged. Rather, we observed weak positive correlations between human presence and both nest success and the probability of successful nests fledging more than a single chick, which potentially demonstrates a 'human shield' effect reducing predation rates. This suggests that mitigation of disturbance at this colony would not represent a viable compensation measure for kittiwakes. However, productivity (chicks per pair) across the study period was at the lower end of levels previously predicted to sustain kittiwake populations. This raises concerns about the future viability of the population if juvenile or adult survival rates decline due to anthropogenic drivers such as offshore wind development, climate change, or impacts of novel infectious diseases.

Indexed as

breeding successcompensationdemographydisturbancemitigationoffshore windfarmsprotected areaseabirds

Identifiers

PMID42741495
PMCPMC13572818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.