ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Emotion regulation and psychological wellbeing in university students: anxiety, depression, stress, and life satisfaction.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion regulation is relevant to psychological adjustment among university students, particularly in contexts characterized by academic pressure and increasing demands for autonomy. This cross-sectional study examined associations between cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction in 106 undergraduate students enrolled in a Social Education degree at a public university in Andalusia, Spain. Participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Satisfaction With Life Scale, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21. Internal consistency was high across the six study dimensions (Cronbach's α =.846-.921; McDonald's ω =.848-.921). Life satisfaction was negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and stress, and the three distress dimensions were positively interrelated. In gender-adjusted hierarchical regressions, emotion-regulation scores explained additional variance in anxiety and stress, but not in depression or life satisfaction. Several associations were opposite to the directions commonly reported in the literature: cognitive reappraisal was positively associated with anxiety, whereas expressive suppression was negatively associated with anxiety and stress. The item-level structural model produced mixed fit evidence: RMSEA, CFI, and TLI/NNFI were favorable, but SRMR, GFI, AGFI, NFI, and RFI indicated important limitations. Because indirect effects were not estimated and the data were cross-sectional, the model does not demonstrate mediation or causal pathways. The findings should therefore be regarded as sample-specific associations requiring replication and a complete scoring audit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.