ArticleHardwareX2026
A flexible small-scale electrochemical flow cell.
Article in HardwareX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reproducible electrochemical characterization in bench-scale flow cells remains limited by variability in cell architecture, assembly practices, and operating conditions across users and laboratories. Although numerous cell designs have been reported, comprehensive guidance detailing component selection, fabrication, assembly, and testing protocols is largely absent. Here, we present a compact flow cell, engineered to improve experimental rigor while maintaining architectural flexibility and cost-effectiveness. The platform incorporates interchangeable components, enabling adaptation to diverse electrochemical applications including redox flow batteries, electrolyzers, and fuel cells, with additional modifications and ancillary balance of plant where necessary. The small scale of the device lowers volume and area requirements for electrolytes and cell components, respectively, facilitating high-throughput, yet systematic studies of emerging chemistries and materials. As a representative use case, we characterize cell performance using two diagnostic configurations and a model redox electrolyte, common in flow battery literature. We also present a framework distinguishing marginal and total repeatability to quantify variability across independent cell builds and operators. Using cell polarization and galvanostatic cycling protocols, we demonstrate consistent performance across configurations and users. By coupling transparent design documentation with a quantitative repeatability framework, this work seeks to establish a reproducible foundation for bench-scale flow cell experimentation and to support cross-laboratory comparability in electrochemical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.