Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741406›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Language performance in children with cerebral palsy: the role of cortical auditory processing beyond motor and cognitive factors.

Mehmet Aslan, Agit Şimşek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet AslanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Inönü University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Agit ŞimşekDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, İnönü University, Malatya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Language impairments in children with cerebral palsy (CP) are often attributed to motor limitations; however, the contribution of central auditory processing remains insufficiently understood. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) provide an objective means of assessing auditory cortical processing and may offer insight into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying language outcomes. Objective: To examine the relationship between cortical auditory processing and language performance in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to determine whether electrophysiological measures remain associated with language outcomes after adjustment for motor severity, cognitive status, age, and hearing status. Methods: This cross-sectional case-control study included 48 children with CP and 48 age- and sex-matched typically developing controls. Language performance was assessed using standardized language measures, and CAEP components (P1, N1, and mismatch negativity [MMN]) were recorded using electroencephalography. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, ANCOVA, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed while accounting for demographic and clinical covariates. Results: Children with CP demonstrated significantly prolonged CAEP latencies, altered amplitudes, and lower receptive and expressive language scores than controls (all Conclusions: Cortical auditory processing measures remained significantly associated with language performance after adjustment for motor severity, cognitive status, age, and hearing status. These findings support the potential value of CAEP measures as complementary neurophysiological markers for the assessment of language impairment in children with cerebral palsy.

Indexed as

auditory processingCAEPcerebral palsycortical auditory evoked potentialslanguage developmentN1 latency

Identifiers

PMID42741406
PMCPMC13572691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.