Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741405›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026

Clinical outcomes after SPECT/CT-guided dual medial branch block and radiofrequency ablation for cervical and thoracic facet pain.

Alex Reid, Masilan Sundara, Keith Polston, Lendrum Morrow, James Eubanks, Renee Rosati, Matthew Sherrier, Ameet Nagpal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex ReidDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.
Masilan SundaraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.
Keith PolstonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.
Lendrum MorrowDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.
James EubanksDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.
Renee RosatiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.
Matthew SherrierDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.
Ameet NagpalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established treatment for cervical and thoracic facet-mediated pain, but selecting the most appropriate treatment levels remains challenging. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has been proposed as an adjunct imaging modality to identify metabolically active facet joints, though its relationship to clinical outcomes is not well defined. Objective: To describe outcomes following SPECT/CT-guided dual MBB and RFA and to Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort included patients who underwent SPECT/CT imaging, dual diagnostic medial branch blocks, and subsequent RFA between January 2023 and May 2025. SPECT/CT imaging was ordered at the discretion of the treating physician, and the resulting cohort reflects patients selected for imaging as part of routine clinical care. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and disability using the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI). Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a ≥34% reduction in NRS and a ≥17% reduction in MODI. An exploratory Fisher's Exact Test with exact odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to compare MCID achievement between combined cohorts. Results: Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria (cervical n = 16; thoracic n = 6). Subgroups were Concordant (n = 6), Partially Concordant (n = 6), Discordant (n = 3), and No Facet Uptake (n = 7). At first follow-up, 16/18 patients (89%) achieved MCID for NRS and 7/13 (54%) achieved MCID for MODI. The small sample size limited the ability to detect differences between concordance groups (NRS 80% vs 100%, p = 0.48; OR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00-6.62; MODI 62.5% vs 40%, p = 0.59; OR 2.32, 95% CI 0.16-44.94); these results are reported for descriptive purposes. Conclusions: Clinically meaningful pain reduction following RFA was observed across all concordance categories. The study was not adequately powered to detect an association between SPECT/CT-RFA concordance and clinical outcomes. Observed point estimates and wide confidence intervals are reported for descriptive purposes. These preliminary findings suggest that SPECT/CT may serve as a complementary diagnostic tool within current interventional pain practice. Larger prospective studies with a non-SPECT/CT control arm are needed to further define its role in procedural planning and patient selection.

Indexed as

Cervical spineFacet joint painImaging concordanceMedial branch blockPain outcomesRadiofrequency ablationSPECT/CTThoracic spine

Identifiers

PMID42741405
PMCPMC13573733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.