Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741364›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Long-term immunity and protection against SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5 following homologous and heterologous mRNA and MVA vaccination.

Patricia Pérez, Gloria Esteso, Isabel García-García, Sara Flores, Cristina Sánchez-Corzo, María A Noriega, José M Casasnovas, Mariano Esteban, Juan García-Arriaza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patricia Pérez *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Gloria Esteso *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Isabel García-GarcíaDepartment of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Sara FloresDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Sánchez-CorzoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
María A NoriegaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
José M CasasnovasDepartment of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Mariano EstebanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Juan García-ArriazaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines have demonstrated high efficacy, their widespread global use remains constrained by high production costs and cold-chain requirements. Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is a highly attenuated and thermostable viral vector with low production costs, potent immunogenicity, and strong potential for global distribution. Here, we compared head-to-head the long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of an MVA-based vaccine candidate with an approved mRNA vaccine in K18-hACE2 mice, both expressing the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 spike (S) protein. Mice received by intramuscular route homologous (mRNA/mRNA and MVA/MVA), heterologous (mRNA/MVA), or single-dose MVA regimens. SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular responses were evaluated at 10 days and 9 months after the last vaccination, as well as antibody levels at intermediate time points, and protection was assessed following intranasal SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5 challenge at 9 months post-vaccination. Binding IgG antibodies against the XBB.1.5 S protein remained high throughout the 9-month period in all vaccinated groups, whereas neutralizing antibody titers peaked early after the last vaccination and progressively declined, converging across regimens over time. S-specific CD8

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansImmunity, CellularImmunogenicity, VaccineMicemRNA VaccinesVaccinationVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesMVA vaccineSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccinesdurable immunitymRNA vaccineMVAOmicron XBB.1.5SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID42741364
PMCPMC13572652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.