ReviewCureus2026
Biologic Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Structured Narrative Review of Joint Preservation Strategies and Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is among the leading causes of chronic pain and physical disability worldwide, representing a major clinical challenge as currently available treatments primarily address symptoms rather than the biological mechanisms driving disease progression. As interest in joint preservation strategies has grown, biologic therapies have emerged as promising approaches capable of modulating the intra-articular environment and potentially delaying invasive interventions. This structured narrative review critically synthesizes contemporary evidence retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to evaluate the biological rationale, clinical applications, therapeutic outcomes, and current limitations of biologic therapies for KOA. Collectively, the available literature suggests that platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate are associated with meaningful improvements in pain, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients and when incorporated into individualized treatment strategies. However, substantial heterogeneity in product composition, preparation techniques, and patient selection continues to limit reproducibility and hamper standardized clinical recommendations. Although the available evidence supports symptomatic improvements with selected biologic therapies, their long-term structural effects and disease-modifying potential remain uncertain. Current evidence therefore supports their consideration as adjunctive options within individualized joint-preservation strategies rather than as replacements for established surgical treatment. Further high-quality comparative studies and greater standardization of treatment protocols and patient selection are needed to define their long-term clinical role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.