Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Safeguarding in dance as a public health issue: a systems-level policy framework.

Jennifer Cumming, Mary L Quinton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer CummingSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Mary L QuintonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safeguarding in dance is an under-recognized public health policy issue, characterized by inconsistent implementation and limited regulation. Drawing on public health frameworks, we conceptualize safeguarding-related harms through a biopsychosocial lens, encompassing physical, psychological, and social impacts. These harms are shaped by interacting factors across individual, interpersonal, organizational, and structural levels. The absence of systemic surveillance and regulatory oversight limits prevention, early intervention, monitoring, and evaluation of safeguarding practices. We propose six complementary policy actions: national surveillance systems, safeguarding audits, a quality mark, clear reporting frameworks, funding-linked accountability, and trauma- and violence-informed care. Together, these actions provide a coordinated, systems-level response, improving accountability, and promoting safe, healthy, and more equitable dance participation.

Indexed as

DancingHealth PolicyPublic HealthHumansPublic Policybiopsychosocial modeldancehealth equitymental self-harmpublic health policysafeguarding in sportsystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID42741348
PMCPMC13572683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.