ArticleEuropean clinical respiratory journal2026
New reference equations for lung function can affect eligibility for lung cancer surgery.
Article in European clinical respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The standard treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer is surgical resection. Assessment of operability includes evaluation of lung function. Current European guidelines are based on reference equations from the former European Community for Steel and Coal (ECSC). New reference equations from Global Lung Initiative (GLI) and Danish Lung Function Material (DALFUMAT) have been published for forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and Lung carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO). Objective: To evaluate whether the use of GLI or DALFUMAT instead of ESCS reference equations result in a higher number of patients with predicted values for FEV1 and DLCO below 30% and 40. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from medical records of 1400 patients. Percent of predicted values calculated using the ECSC reference equations were compared with those using the GLI and DALFUMAT reference equations. Results: GLI reference equations did not result in a significant change in number of patients with FEV1 or DLCO percent of predicted below 30% or 40%.DALFUMAT reference equations made a significant change in the number of patients who had a FEV1 percent of predicted below 40% ( Conclusion: Using national reference equations can affect the pre-operative assessment of patients with lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.