SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Accuracy-latency trade-offs and absent embedded validation in deep learning driver drowsiness detection: a PRISMA systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Driver drowsiness is a leading cause of road traffic fatalities worldwide, and the convergence of computer vision and deep learning has transformed driver-state monitoring by enabling non-invasive detection within Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). Methods: This systematic literature review, conducted using the PRISMA 2020 methodology and the Kitchenham protocol, synthesizes findings from 33 peer-reviewed studies published between January 2021 and October 2025 to examine the architectures, biomarkers, performance benchmarks, and deployment barriers of deep-learning-based drowsiness detection. Results: The literature is dominated by convolutional single-pass designs; no reviewed model combines an accuracy above 99% with a latency below 100 ms, and none were evaluated on embedded or automotive-grade hardware. Discussion: This distribution highlights a persistent accuracy-latency trade-off and emphasizes the need for embedded hardware and cross-dataset evaluation. By synthesizing the available evidence, this review characterizes the current state of the art and proposes a prioritized framework for selecting deep learning architectures for embedded ADAS applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.