Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741260›Full record

ArticleChemical science2026

Predicting room temperature phosphorescence of new organic molecules by combining physical models and data-driven methods.

Xia Wu, Alessandro Troisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xia WuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 3BX UK xia.wu@liverpool.ac.uk A.Troisi@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-9976
Alessandro TroisiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 3BX UK xia.wu@liverpool.ac.uk A.Troisi@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-5648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rational discovery of new RTP emitters remains challenging because phosphorescence depends on multiple competing processes, including intersystem crossing, nonradiative decay, and competition with fluorescence. While several mechanistic hypotheses have been proposed, like enhanced spin-orbit coupling, reduced energy gap between singlet and triplet states, and favourable electronic transition properties, the extent to which these factors can quantitatively predict RTP behaviour remains unclear. In this work, we have collected a dataset of 218 metal-free organic RTP emitters from the literature. We first explored physical approaches to predict phosphorescence yield using descriptors derived from established mechanisms and hypotheses, such as favourable spin-orbit coupling, reorganization energy, and oscillator strength. Although these quantities show statistically meaningful correlations with RTP behaviour, the physical models alone are insufficient to construct a robust quantitative predictive tool. We therefore developed a data-driven machine learning (ML) model based on the Random Forest algorithm, combining these physically motivated descriptors with additional topological descriptors derived from the molecular structure. After feature selection, the optimized models achieved prediction accuracies of 0.774 and 0.820 identifying long-lifetime (lifetime > 90 ms) and long-wavelength (RTP emission > 525 nm) RTP materials, respectively. With the boundary from the physical process and ML analysis, 65 candidates are identified from 48 168 molecules with predicted probabilities greater than 0.75 for both long-lifetime and long-wavelength properties, providing a focused set of promising materials for further experimental validation.

Identifiers

PMID42741260
PMCPMC13572978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.