ArticleEcancermedicalscience2026
PEDCan: acceptability and feasibility of a mobile application to support primary health-care workers in recognising clinical features of childhood cancer in Uganda.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early diagnosis of childhood cancer depends on a high index of suspicion and timely referral by primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) to tertiary centers. This study aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a mobile application among PHCWs in recognising cancer-related clinical features in children. Methods: We developed a mobile application called (PEDCan) to support PHCWs in recognising cancer-related clinical features in children, initiating remote consultations with specialists and referring suspected cases to cancer centers when necessary. In May 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study among consenting PHCWs in southwestern Uganda to collect data on their knowledge of childhood cancer, smartphone ownership and internet usage. After training participants on the use of the application through mock clinical vignettes, we assessed their ease of use and readiness to adopt the application. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the proportions of participants able and willing to use the application. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of Mbarara University of Science and Technology. Results: A total of 44 PHCWs participated in the study; 25 (56.8%) were nurses or midwives, 8 (18.2%) were clinical officers, 3 (6.8%) were medical doctors and 8 (18.2%) belonged to other professional cadres. All participants had previously heard about childhood cancer, and 28 (63.6%) had previously encountered a child suspected to have cancer. Thirty-eight (86.4%) participants owned a smartphone and used the internet, while 12 (31.6%) reported having constant internet access. Thirty-eight (86.3%) participants found the PEDCan application very easy or easy to use, and all participants expressed willingness to use it. Conclusion: PHCWs in the participating health facilities were able and willing to use the PEDCan mobile application to recognise childhood cancer clinical features and initiate remote expert consultations using mock vignettes. A pilot study involving real patients would further demonstrate the application's effectiveness in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.