ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
Real-world effectiveness of fluticasone propionate-azelastine nasal spray in moderate-to-severe nonallergic and perennial allergic rhinitis.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although combined intranasal corticosteroid-antihistamine sprays are approved for allergic rhinitis, evidence supporting their effectiveness in nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) remains limited. Objective: To compare the treatment response to fluticasone propionate-azelastine (FP-Aze) for treating NAR and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Methods: This prospective observational real-world study enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe PAR or NAR. Participants received FP-Aze nasal spray (50/137 μg), 1 spray per nostril twice daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the visual analog scale (VAS) for rhinitis, ranging from 0 to 100 mm. Treatment effectiveness in NAR was assessed for noninferiority, with a prespecified margin of 23 mm on the VAS relative to PAR. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of non-nasal symptoms and quality of life (QoL). Results: Patients with moderate-to-severe PAR ( Conclusion: The effectiveness of FP-Aze in moderate-to-severe NAR was noninferior to PAR on the VAS for rhinitis, supporting its use in this population. These findings help address an important evidence gap, as data supporting FP-Aze in NAR remain limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.