Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741227›Full record

ArticleBioscience2026

Manage your image database with computer vision-Lessons learned at Encyclopedia of Life.

K Wolcott, J Hammock, K Schulz, T M Orrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K WolcottNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-4569
J HammockNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, United States.
K SchulzNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, United States.
T M OrrellNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20560, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural history museums house invaluable biodiversity archives, but discoveries are often limited by the accessibility of collections data. As digitization of specimens and metadata accelerates, automated methods are needed to organize image databases and enable large-scale analyses. Beyond species identification, computer vision (CV) can automate image database management by standardizing gallery displays through intelligent cropping and extracting tags to improve search functionality. Encyclopedia of Life is a biodiversity database that aims to document all ∼2.2 million known species. Using EOL images and crowdsourced data, combined with pretrained and custom-trained models, we present 14 CV pipelines in three categories: Object Detection for Image Cropping, Object Detection for Image Tagging, and Classification for Image Tagging. Pipelines are open source, available on GitHub (https://github.com/EOL/computer-vision-with-EOL-images), and documented for nonexperts. We share models, datasets, and methodological insights demonstrating how CV can unlock novel information from over 1.5 million images.

Indexed as

biodiversity informaticscomputer visiondatabase managementmachine learningnatural history collections

Identifiers

PMID42741227
PMCPMC13572879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.