Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741201›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Intra-shift affective dynamics in emergency unit workers: temporal deterioration and recovery windows.

Rodolfo Mendoza-Llanos, Sebastián Maureira-Meneses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rodolfo Mendoza-LlanosDepartment of Social Science, School of Psychology, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.
Sebastián Maureira-MenesesDepartment of Social Science, School of Psychology, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burnout research typically relies on global self-report measures that provide limited information about affective experience across the workday. Inspired by the Day Reconstruction Method, this exploratory study examined reconstructed intra-shift well-being-distress trajectories among 76 emergency healthcare workers. Participants completed a structured hourly reconstruction of a typical workday from T-2 to T14, together with measures of burnout and emotional dysregulation. Descriptive analyses, Pearson correlations, and sex-based mean comparisons were conducted, with false discovery rate corrections applied to the inferential analyses. The mean reconstructed trajectory showed an initial increase in well-being before and shortly after shift onset, a progressive decline across much of the shift, and an increase in affective valence during the post-shift period. All correlations between adjacent reconstructed time points remained significant after correction, providing exploratory support for short-range cross-time rank-order consistency. Although unadjusted correlations suggested less favorable ratings at selected time points among participants with higher burnout and emotional dysregulation scores, none remained significant after correction. Likewise, no time-specific sex comparison survived correction. These preliminary findings suggest that considering when affective declines occur across emergency shifts may help organizations identify candidate periods for brief support actions, such as supervisory check-ins, team support, or recovery opportunities. However, because the trajectories were retrospectively reconstructed, the timing and effectiveness of such micro-interventions should be evaluated in larger real-time studies before informing organizational practice.

Indexed as

affective dynamicsburnoutemotional dysregulationhealthcare workersrecovery strategies

Identifiers

PMID42741201
PMCPMC13572270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.