ArticleBrain & spine2026
Surgical and postoperative management of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a national survey among Dutch hand and neurosurgeons.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is a condition for which multiple surgical techniques exist, yet no consensus has been reached on the optimal approach. Additionally, postoperative follow-up protocols are not standardized, resulting in considerable variability in clinical practice. Research question: To better understand current practices, a nationwide survey was conducted among Dutch surgeons involved in the surgical management of UNE. Materials and methods: An online questionnaire was sent to all plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons with expertise in hand surgery in the Netherlands. The survey assessed surgical preferences, postoperative follow-up routines, and rehabilitation practices for both primary and revision UNE cases. Results: In total, 163 surgeons filled out the survey. Open decompression was the preferred surgical technique for primary UNE (92.6%), subcutaneous transposition was most commonly selected for revision procedures (37.9%). The initial postoperative consultation was typically scheduled 4-8 weeks after surgery (55.2%). In case of persistent and recurrent UNE, repeated physical appointments were the most frequently chosen follow-up strategy (82.6% and 63.4%, respectively). For recurrent UNE, 31.7% opted for immediate diagnostic testing, with 64.7% selecting both electromyography and ultrasound as the preferred diagnostic approach. Postoperative splinting was rarely advised (0.6%). Hand therapy was recommended by 66.3% of surgeons and usually initiated within the first four weeks postoperatively (54.6%). Discussion and conclusion: While there is broad agreement on the use of open decompression for primary UNE, notable variation remains in revision procedures and follow-up strategies. These findings underscore the need for standardized, evidence-based protocols to support consistent and effective care for UNE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.