Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741123›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Occupational exposures and worker health in decarbonization of energy-intensive industries: a scoping review protocol.

Johanna Samulin Erdem, Ingrid Løken Jørgensen, Lina Wik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna Samulin ErdemDepartment of Occupational Toxicology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Løken JørgensenNational Surveillance for Work Environment and Occupational Health, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Lina WikDepartment of Occupational Toxicology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy-intensive industries account for a substantial share of the global greenhouse gas emissions. The transition to net-zero emissions by 2050 demands development of industrial infrastructure and implementation of low-carbon technologies. This transition is expected to result in altered exposure scenarios for workers. This scoping review aims to map the evidence on the occupational exposures and related health consequences of industrial decarbonization processes and to identify current research gaps. The review will follow the JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews and is registered under the Open Science Framework (osf.io/7xzy4). A systematic literature search combining terms related to industrial decarbonization with occupational and worker-related terms will be conducted in Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus. The search will be supplemented by targeted gray literature searches to identify relevant technical reports and policy documents. Data will be charted using a standardized template and synthesized descriptively and thematically by occupational exposure and health effects, investigated populations, industrial sectors, decarbonization processes or technologies to map patterns in the available evidence, identify emerging occupational risks, and current research gaps. Clinical trial registration: osf.io/7xzy4.

Indexed as

IndustryOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthHumansScoping Reviews as Topicdecarbonization technologiesenergy-intensive industriesgreen transitionindustrial decarbonizationoccupational exposureoccupational healthworker healthworkplace hazards

Identifiers

PMID42741123
PMCPMC13572700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.