ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
ADC-based radiomics for risk stratification in prostate cancer: a clinical decision support study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reliable differentiation between malignant and benign prostate lesions remains a critical challenge in clinical practice, particularly in settings with limited access to expert interpretation of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). We investigated whether a streamlined radiomics framework based solely on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) imaging could provide accurate, reproducible, and interpretable diagnostic support for prostate cancer detection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed ADC images from 198 men, including 121 patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer and 77 patients without malignancy, acquired between 2020 and 2025. Following image resampling and standardization, 107 radiomic features were extracted and subjected to hierarchical feature selection using recursive feature elimination followed by LASSO regression. Four discriminative features were retained to train support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression, and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) classifiers. Model performance was evaluated in independent training and testing cohorts using accuracy, AUC, precision, recall, F1 score, and specificity. Results: The GBDT model demonstrated the most robust performance, achieving AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75-0.87) in the training cohort and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.85) in the testing cohort. In the testing cohort, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84), a recall of 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00-1.00), an F1 score of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), and a specificity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88). The selected radiomic features reflected image energy, textural irregularity, and intralesional heterogeneity and were consistently associated with malignant pathology. Discussion: A minimal-feature radiomics model derived exclusively from ADC images showed promising diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign prostate lesions. By avoiding reliance on multiparametric imaging, this streamlined approach may provide a practical, reproducible, and resource-efficient strategy for supporting prostate cancer diagnosis, particularly in settings where expert mpMRI interpretation is limited. Further multicenter validation, integration of clinical variables, and incorporation of explainable artificial intelligence approaches are warranted to establish its robustness and enhance its translational potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.