ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis of three Malvaceae species on the basis of chloroplast genomes.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Malvaceae family shows rich species diversity and has substantial economic and medicinal value. However, the frequent interspecific hybridization among members of this family has resulted in confused phylogenetic relationships among the groups, limiting the usefulness of traditional classification methods. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the phylogenetic relationships among selected taxa of Malvaceae by evaluating 23 chloroplast (CP) genomes, including three newly assembled CP genomes. Among these three genomes, the CP genome of Results: The results showed that the genomes ranged from 160,403 to 161,978 base pairs in length and consisted of small single copies (SSCs) and large single copies (LSCs) separated by two inverted repeat sequences (IRs), forming a typical quadripartite circular structure. The entire genome sequence showed relative conservation across species in terms of structure, GC content, codon usage, and gene composition. The mutation sites were mainly located in the LSC and SSC regions, and the variability in the non-coding regions was higher than that in the coding regions. The nucleotide polymorphism (Pi) analysis identified the non-coding regions such as Discussion: In conclusion, the increasing availability of CP genome resources will enhance our understanding of the classification and evolutionary patterns of the Malvaceae family. The development of molecular markers will provide important molecular evidence for precise identification and classification revision of plants in this family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.