Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741041›Full record

ArticleAnnals of vascular diseases2026

Clinical Outcomes of the "Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-First" Protocol for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A 10-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Yutaka Kobayashi, Atsushi Kawakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of vascular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yutaka KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Uji Tokushukai Medical Center, Uji, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi KawakamiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Uji Tokushukai Medical Center, Uji, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality. While endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has shown promising results in elective settings, the evidence supporting its use as the primary treatment for patients with rAAA remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate both the clinical outcomes and the inherent advantages and disadvantages of our "EVAR-first" protocol for patients with rAAA over a 10-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of data extracted from medical records identified 93 consecutive patients with rAAA who underwent EVAR from January 2014 to January 2024. All patients were treated using the "EVAR-first" protocol. Initially, percutaneous puncture of the bilateral common femoral arteries and the left brachial artery was performed. General anesthesia was then induced with the endovascular balloon control and EVAR was performed. Results: EVAR was successfully performed in all patients with rAAA. The mean follow-up period was 1386.5 ± 1171.1 days. After the 30-day period, no new complications were observed. Endovascular re-interventions were performed in 9 patients (9.7%). The overall survival rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years for the entire cohort were 87.1%, 70.9%, and 60.5%, respectively. Conclusions: This single-center experience suggests favorable outcomes for adopting the "EVAR-first" policy for all rAAA patients.

Indexed as

abdominal aortic aneurysmendovascular aneurysm repairendovascular proceduresretrospective studyruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Identifiers

PMID42741041
PMCPMC13572578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.