ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Combining non-microbial biostimulants and different application methods affects yield, antioxidant activity, nutritional and functional value of pea and arugula microgreens.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microgreens are considered a good source of nutritional and functional compounds, offering humans significant health benefits. Biostimulants are recognized as a sustainable tool to elicit growth and development of vegetables. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effects of a plant protein hydrolysate (PH) and a seaweed extract (SWE) - supplied via seed priming or root application - on pea and arugula microgreens performance. Moreover, a partial budget analysis was conducted to assess the economic implication of biostimulants application. Hydropriming and PH-priming treatments enhanced pea microgreens yield compared to the root application treatment's counterpart by 53.2% and 33.3%, respectively. Nitrates were increased by SWE application and reduced by PH supply, in both species, compared with the not biostimulated plants, particularly when biostimulants were applied via root application [SWE, + 26.6% (pea); PH, -19.9% (pea), SWE, + 6.5% (arugula); PH, -24.3% (arugula)]. The combination of biostimulants and priming enhanced ascorbic acid compared to the control × root application (negative control) in pea microgreens by 20.9%, whereas, in arugula, either the biostimulants or priming alone significantly improved the aforesaid parameter. Biostimulants boosted total polyphenol content in pea microgreens, supplied via priming (SWE, + 21.5%; PH, 22.8%, compared to the hydropriming) or root application (SWE, + 15.7%; PH, 14.6%, compared with the negative control). Total polyphenols in arugula microgreens increased when PH and SWE were supplied via priming (+14.3%, for both biostimulants, compared to the hydropriming). Biostimulants significantly increased the antioxidant capacity (DPPH), although the method of application did not significantly affect DPPH. These findings confirmed the efficacy of biostimulants in modulating microgreens qualitative features. Furthermore, the partial budget analysis underlined that the use of both biostimulants, independently of the type of application, is economically suitable for pea, but not always convenient for arugula. The application of PH or SWE, especially via root application, was a suitable strategy to increase the nutritive and functional values of pea and arugula microgreens, contributing to their potential as valuable novel foods for human consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.