Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741026›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Combining non-microbial biostimulants and different application methods affects yield, antioxidant activity, nutritional and functional value of pea and arugula microgreens.

Beppe Benedetto Consentino, Pietro Bellitto, Fabiana Mancuso, Francesco Salamone, Theodora Ntanasi, Georgia Ntatsi, Simona Napoli, Filippo Sgroi, Salvatore La Bella, Leo Sabatino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Beppe Benedetto ConsentinoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Pietro BellittoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Fabiana MancusoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Francesco SalamoneDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Theodora NtanasiLaboratory of Vegetable Production, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgia NtatsiLaboratory of Vegetable Production, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Simona NapoliDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Filippo SgroiDepartment of Economics, Business and Statistics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Salvatore La BellaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Leo SabatinoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microgreens are considered a good source of nutritional and functional compounds, offering humans significant health benefits. Biostimulants are recognized as a sustainable tool to elicit growth and development of vegetables. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effects of a plant protein hydrolysate (PH) and a seaweed extract (SWE) - supplied via seed priming or root application - on pea and arugula microgreens performance. Moreover, a partial budget analysis was conducted to assess the economic implication of biostimulants application. Hydropriming and PH-priming treatments enhanced pea microgreens yield compared to the root application treatment's counterpart by 53.2% and 33.3%, respectively. Nitrates were increased by SWE application and reduced by PH supply, in both species, compared with the not biostimulated plants, particularly when biostimulants were applied via root application [SWE, + 26.6% (pea); PH, -19.9% (pea), SWE, + 6.5% (arugula); PH, -24.3% (arugula)]. The combination of biostimulants and priming enhanced ascorbic acid compared to the control × root application (negative control) in pea microgreens by 20.9%, whereas, in arugula, either the biostimulants or priming alone significantly improved the aforesaid parameter. Biostimulants boosted total polyphenol content in pea microgreens, supplied via priming (SWE, + 21.5%; PH, 22.8%, compared to the hydropriming) or root application (SWE, + 15.7%; PH, 14.6%, compared with the negative control). Total polyphenols in arugula microgreens increased when PH and SWE were supplied via priming (+14.3%, for both biostimulants, compared to the hydropriming). Biostimulants significantly increased the antioxidant capacity (DPPH), although the method of application did not significantly affect DPPH. These findings confirmed the efficacy of biostimulants in modulating microgreens qualitative features. Furthermore, the partial budget analysis underlined that the use of both biostimulants, independently of the type of application, is economically suitable for pea, but not always convenient for arugula. The application of PH or SWE, especially via root application, was a suitable strategy to increase the nutritive and functional values of pea and arugula microgreens, contributing to their potential as valuable novel foods for human consumption.

Indexed as

Eruca sativaPisum sativumprimingprotein hydrolisateroot applicationseaweed extract

Identifiers

PMID42741026
PMCPMC13572118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.