Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741011›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Globalization and glocalization in graduate medical education: the ACGME international experience in Qatar.

Shireen Suliman, Abdulla Al Naimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shireen SulimanDepartment of Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Abdulla Al NaimiDepartment of Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental challenge associated with the implementation of global benchmarks arises from reconciling standardized international expectations with diverse local contexts, as differences in healthcare systems, cultural norms, and resource availability often limit the direct applicability of externally developed standards and require context-sensitive adaptation. As the globalization of graduate medical education continues to advance, initiatives such as the international adoption of milestone-based frameworks demonstrate that global convergence is feasible when accompanied by deliberate localization. In Qatar, following the establishment of GME in the form of residency and fellowship programs, there was a clear need to introduce an international accreditation body to support the development, standardization, and formalization of GME within the national context. With the adoption of Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education International (ACGME-I) accreditation, it is important to pay attention to the processes by which accreditation standards are contextualized and aligned with local educational, clinical, and health-system realities. This piece of work aims to explore how ACGME-International accreditation standards are contextualized within local GME systems, using the Qatar experience as a case example to examine institutional motivations, adaptation strategies, and perceived alignment with local educational and clinical realities. We aim to underscore how effective accreditation depends not only on compliance with global standards but also on their thoughtful integration within the realities of the local educational and health-care context.

Indexed as

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical EducationAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–Internationalglobalizationglocalization of learninggraduate medical educationQatar

Identifiers

PMID42741011
PMCPMC13572289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.