ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy and mechanisms of lumbopelvic manipulation combined with Baduanjin exercise for postpartum low back pain: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Postpartum low back pain (PLBP) is common among puerperal women, with complex etiology involving spinal-pelvic changes and reduced core stability. It often becomes chronic, impairing quality of life and mental health. Non-pharmacological therapies are widely used and show good outcomes, but high-quality RCTs are limited, and objective evidence of core muscle activation after combined manual therapy and Baduanjin is lacking. Baduanjin is a traditional Chinese mind-body exercise that uses gentle movements and coordinated breathing to enhance core stability, making it particularly suitable for postpartum women. Previous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function in patients with chronic low back pain, with preliminary evidence also supporting its benefits in the postpartum population. This gap undermines the protocol's credibility and clinical uptake. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of lumbopelvic manipulation plus Baduanjin for PLBP, and to explore neuromuscular mechanisms using surface electromyography (sEMG). Methods and analysis: This single-center, assessor-blinded RCT will enroll 50 participants randomized 1:1 to control (health education + lumbopelvic manipulation) or experimental group (same plus Baduanjin). The control group will receive lumbopelvic manipulation (15 min/session, three times per week), while the experimental group will receive the same manipulation plus supervised Baduanjin exercise (12 min/session, three times per week) for 4 weeks. The 4-week intervention is followed by follow-up assessments at weeks 8 and 12. Primary outcome: pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale, NPRS). Secondary outcomes: functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), quality of life (SF-36), and sEMG parameters (%MVIC and mean power frequency, MPF) of the lumbar extensors (erector spinae and multifidus) and abdominal wall muscles (rectus abdominis, external/internal oblique, and transversus abdominis). Assessments at baseline (week 0) and week 4; NPRS, ODI, SF-36 also at weeks 8 and 12. Discussion: This trial will evaluate the efficacy of lumbopelvic manipulation combined with Baduanjin exercise for postpartum low back pain, a population with limited medication options during lactation. The inclusion of sEMG alongside patient-reported outcomes will provide objective evidence on neuromuscular changes, extending current evidence that has relied primarily on subjective measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.