ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Coronary angiography and reperfusion therapy following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in women.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is lower in women than in men, often attributed to older age, more comorbidities and non-shockable rhythms at presentation. Coronary angiography and reperfusion therapy are cornerstones in post-cardiac arrest care yet appear to be used less often in women. Data on coronary artery disease among patients presenting with non-shockable rhythms and no ST-segment elevation remain limited. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study including all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted alive to Swedish hospitals between 2010 and 2019. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization were calculated for women compared with men, controlling for age, comorbidities, and initial rhythm. Sex-specific angiographic findings were examined in patients without shockable rhythm or ST-segment elevation. Results: Of 8641 patients, 29.4% were women. Coronary angiography was performed in 31.5% of women versus 51.0% of men. Women were less likely to undergo coronary angiography (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90) and percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.90). After adjusting for angiographic findings, intervention rates were similar between sexes (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80-1.18). Among angiographed patients with non-shockable rhythms and no ST-elevation, significant coronary artery disease was found in 31% of women and 53% of men. Conclusion: Women with resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were less likely to undergo coronary angiography yet had similar rates of percutaneous coronary intervention when obstructive coronary artery disease was present. In patients without an initial shockable rhythm or ST-segment elevation, many had significant coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.