ReviewVeterinary and animal science2026
A Bibliometric analysis of digestibility kinetics in leguminous and non-leguminous forage species with bovine inoculum and exogenous additives: Intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and global research trends.
Review in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diet optimization and the accurate assessment of ruminal fermentation are critical for the sustainability of livestock systems. Despite the vast literature, knowledge regarding digestibility kinetics through the comparison of bovine inoculum with exogenous agents remains fragmented. This study employed an exploratory bibliometric approach to analyze the structure and evolution of global knowledge on digestibility kinetics in forage species, evaluated using bovine inoculum and exogenous enzymes. A retrospective review (2015 to mid-2026) was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines in Scopus, consolidating 120 documents analyzed with RStudio (Bibliometrix) and VOSviewer software. The validity of the trends was verified using the chi-square test of independence (α = 0.05). The scientific output reflects a field in the process of maturing. Bradford's Law identified a specialized core dominated by the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.