ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Shock index-modified qSOFA improves mortality risk stratification in patients with sepsis beyond conventional qSOFA.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score does not incorporate hemodynamic perfusion parameters, which may limit its ability to identify septic patients with early circulatory compromise before the development of overt hypotension. This study aimed to evaluate a modified score incorporating the shock index (SI), termed SI-qSOFA, and to determine whether it could improve identification of high-risk patients classified as low-risk by conventional qSOFA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 2,853 adult patients with sepsis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while ICU admission was treated as a secondary, exploratory outcome. In addition to evaluating overall predictive performance, a prespecified subgroup analysis was performed in patients with qSOFA < 2 to determine whether SI-qSOFA could identify high-risk patients who would otherwise have been considered low-risk. Discriminative ability was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate independent associations. Calibration was assessed using the bootstrap resampling. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to assess incremental predictive value. Results: Among the 2,853 patients, 2,456 (86.1%) had qSOFA < 2. Within this conventionally low-risk subgroup, SI-qSOFA demonstrated good discriminative performance for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.83) and ICU admission (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.86), with negative predictive values of 0.98 for both outcomes. In the overall cohort, SI-qSOFA showed slightly higher discrimination than qSOFA for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.81 vs. 0.79, DeLong Conclusion: SI-qSOFA may improve identification of septic patients with occult circulatory dysfunction who are classified as low-risk by conventional qSOFA. Although the overall improvement in discrimination was modest, SI-qSOFA consistently identified additional high-risk patients within the qSOFA-negative population while maintaining simplicity for bedside application. These findings suggest that SI-qSOFA may serve as a practical adjunctive bedside tool for early sepsis risk stratification and outcome prediction before the development of overt hypotension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.