Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740870›Full record

ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2025

Barriers and Facilitators of Nurses' Involvement in Guideline Development and Adaptation: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Protocol.

Linda Velapi, Sara Cooper, Tamara Kredo, Bey Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda VelapiSchool of Public Health University of the Western Cape Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3896-5671
Sara CooperCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9894-236X
Tamara KredoSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7115-9535
Bey SchmidtSchool of Public Health University of the Western Cape Cape Town South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses often use clinical practice guidelines to assist them in treating childhood cases. Guidelines provide an easily accessible resource that clinicians can review to expand their knowledge base and determine patient care. Those involved in the guideline development and adaptation process usually have a better understanding when it comes to making use of the guideline. It is imperative to understand how the implementers of guidelines can be involved in the guideline development and adaptation process. The use of a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis is encouraged as it is the most appropriate method for this review because it enables the systematic integration of findings from primary qualitative studies that explore social, contextual, and experiential dimensions. This review seeks to answer the question: What are the views, experiences, and perceived barriers and facilitators of nurses involved in the development or adaptation of clinical practice guidelines? Using the SPIDER framework, this synthesis will focus on qualitative studies involving nurses (S), their participation in guideline development and adaptation (PI), using interviews or focus groups (D), to explore perceptions of engagement, challenges, and enabling factors (E), within a qualitative research paradigm (R). Objectives: To identify and synthesize studies exploring methods and processes for involving nurses in guideline development and adaptation. To explore the barriers to and facilitators of involving nurses in guideline development and adaptation. Methods: This review will follow the thematic synthesis approach and will be reported according to the ENTREQ checklist to ensure transparency in synthesis methods and the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reporting of the review process. Searches will be carried out in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Medline and PsycINFO. We will apply thematic content analysis, which involves coding of extracted text, developing descriptive themes and generating analytical themes.

Identifiers

PMID42740870
PMCPMC13563405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.