Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740832›Full record

ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2026

Planetary Health in Health Guidelines and Health Technology Assessments: A Scoping Review.

Pakeezah Saadat, Maheen Raja, Andrea J Darzi, Charlotte T J Michels, Alina Herrmann, Karolina Anna Scahill, Laura M Jewell, K M Saif-Ur-Rahman, Hendrik Napierala, Ruben Heuer and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Pakeezah SaadatDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-8962
Maheen RajaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada.
Andrea J DarziDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2498-1697
Charlotte T J MichelsKnowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists Utrecht the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-1872
Alina HerrmannInstitute of Global Health Medical Faculty Heidelberg University, Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.
Karolina Anna ScahillCollege of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.
Laura M JewellDepartment of Family Medicine Queens University Kingston Canada.
K M Saif-Ur-RahmanCollege of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences University of Galway Galway Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8702-7094
Hendrik NapieralaInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitat Berlin and Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin Berlin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1542-2877
Ruben HeuerDivision of Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitat Berlin und Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0207-7373
Rebecca L MorganDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-4897
Grigorios I LeontiadisDepartment of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5072-7599
Ignacio NeumannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada.
Fiona A MillerInstitute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health; Collaborative Centre for Climate, Health & Sustainable Care University of Toronto Toronto Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-6255
Holger J SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-8479
Thomas PiggottDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-5386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Individual human health is inextricably linked to planetary health, which refers to the health of human civilization and the natural systems on which it depends. These systems are captured by the nine planetary boundaries which together define a safe operating space for humanity. The health sector contributes to the transgression of these boundaries, thereby jeopardizing both individual and planetary health. However, there is a growing interest in the health sector in incorporating the preservation of planetary boundaries into health guidelines and health technology assessments (HTAs), which synthesize evidence and guide healthcare decisions. Methods: This scoping review aims to describe methodological guidance and considerations for incorporating planetary health in health guidelines and HTAs. We conducted a scoping review adhering to the JBI methodology including articles from several databases since inception until September 2023. We used narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics to describe eligible studies. Results: Of the 38 included studies, 14 (37%) were commentaries, six (16%) were methodological papers, and four (10·5%) were health guidelines. Included studies focused primarily on greenhouse gas emissions as an outcome. The included health guidelines were rated at a median of 52% (range: 16% to 67%) on AGREE II for methodological quality. Discussion: Key findings pertain to the normative significance of planetary health in guidelines and HTAs, scope and quality of included studies, inconsistencies in methods, and challenges in implementation. These findings will inform future Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidance on planetary health. Registration: A protocol of this scoping review was registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/3jmsa) and published in the journal Systematic Reviews (10.1186/s13643-024-02577-2).

Indexed as

GRADEhealth guidelineshealth technology assessmentsplanetary boundariesplanetary health

Identifiers

PMID42740832
PMCPMC13563324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.