Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740807›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

A theoretical description of the tree cricket ear as a highly phase sensitive biomechanical interferometer.

Emine Celiker, Gregory Patrick Sutton, Natasha Mhatre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emine CelikerSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Gregory Patrick SuttonSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Lincoln, UK, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK.
Natasha MhatreDepartment of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sound localization is essential for insect survival, enabling them to pinpoint predators and conspecifics. However, their minute size hinders the use of inter-aural time or intensity differences, a strategy employed by mammals for localizing sound. In this study, we numerically demonstrate that tree cricket hearing systems can act as an interferometer to support sound localization by first splitting the sound wave into two parts, sending one wave to an anterior tympanic membrane and sending the second to a posterior tympanic membrane. The membranes then carry the split waves to a common point, the tracheal wall, where the re-assembly of the wave causes mechanical interference that is sensitive to microsecond time delays. This principle, interferometry, is usually thought of in terms of light and can measure extremely small time delays. Tree cricket ears are equipped to use the same principle as the light interferometer, except with sound, to measure extremely precise locations.

Indexed as

biological interferometerEnsiferainsect auditory biomechanicsreduced-order model

Identifiers

PMID42740807
PMCPMC13571973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.