Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740804›Full record

ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2024

Why all clinical guideline recommendations are 'Conditional'.

Peter C Wyer, John Gabbay, Edward H Suh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Pan-European Fragile Populations Cohort for COVID-19: What Worked, What Didn't, and Lessons Learned.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter C WyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Columbia University New York New York USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1447-7945
John GabbayFaculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK.
Edward H SuhDepartment of Emergency Medicine Columbia University New York New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of clinical guidelines on practitioner behaviour and clinical care remains in doubt.The acceptability of a 5- or 10-year delay in producing a 'strong' clinically important recommendation is unlikely to hold.Practitioners think holistically, in contrast to the analytical thinking that characterizes clinical research.Rapidly accessible, flexible, 'knowledge-in-practice-in-context' cannot be simply replaced by a focused piece of new research or guideline.

Indexed as

health equitymindlinespractice guidelines

Identifiers

PMID42740804
PMCPMC13563338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.