Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740788›Full record

ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2026

Putting People at the Centre of Guidelines.

Karen Graham, Naomi Fearns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen GrahamScottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Edinburgh Great Britain UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2542-6278
Naomi FearnsHealthcare Improvement Scotland Edinburgh Great Britain UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is central: SIGN guidelines are shaped by people with lived experience, improving quality and relevance.The article uses the SIGN Dementia guideline as a case study: Carers and third sector organisations helped ensure person-centred care and influenced the inclusion of topics like anticipatory grief.Inclusive engagement methods: SIGN used virtual meetings, presentations, and peer review to gather feedback from people with dementia and carers throughout development.Challenges addressed: The team managed power dynamics and communication barriers, ensuring all voices were heard and valued.Real impact: Lived experience led to changes in recommendations, such as adding sections on grief and regular care plan reviews.Conclusion: Inclusive PPI results in more practical, trusted, and relevant guidelines for all stakeholders.

Identifiers

PMID42740788
PMCPMC13563316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.