Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740775›Full record

ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2026

What Do Adults Know and Think About the United Kingdom Physical Activity Guidelines, and How Should They be Communicated? A Qualitative Exploration.

Gwen Gillham, Graham Baker, Paul Kelly, Chloë Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gwen GillhamPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4914-0626
Graham BakerPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-6778
Paul KellyPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1946-9848
Chloë WilliamsonPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2148-7586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, there is limited insight into public understanding and opinion of physical activity guidelines (PAG) despite the acknowledged importance of communicating such health-related information. This study aimed to explore adults' understanding and opinions of current UK Chief Medical Officer's PAG (UKCMOPAG) in addition to messaging preferences to inform effective communication of future PAG. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with 17 adults (52% female, mean age 33.1 years) in Scotland, United Kingdom. The interview schedule included open-ended questions developed to explore understanding and opinion of guidelines, and preferences for communication using the physical activity messaging framework. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results: Participants were aware that PAG likely existed but could not accurately recall them. Once informed of the UKCMOPAG, they found them unappealing and unclear. They expressed uncertainty about the intended audience and questioned their relevance across different groups. Participants were, however, aware of some benefits of PA and had lived experience of short-term benefits (e.g., improved sleep and mood). As such, there was a preference for communicating UKCMOPAG through positive, relatable messages emphasising everyday benefits. Participants disliked threshold messages, suggesting continuum-based messages with a sliding scale of PA volume/intensity and associated benefits. Lastly, participants indicated that messages should be delivered by trustworthy sources, identified as the National Health Service (NHS). Conclusion: This study is the first qualitative exploration of how the general adult population in Scotland interpret the UKCMOPAG. Findings show that current communication strategies are not aligned to public understanding and opinions of PAG, indicating a need to change communication approaches. Future updates should separate technical guidance from public-facing messages, use relatable language, inclusive examples and ensure delivery by trusted sources. Continuum- and gain-framed messaging highlighting short-term PA benefits may also improve engagement. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of such audience-centred messages.

Indexed as

advicecommunicationexercisemessagingpublic healthrecommendations

Identifiers

PMID42740775
PMCPMC13563404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.