ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2026
Blood Activating and Stasis Removing Chinese Patent Medicine in Perioperative Period of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction: A Protocol for a Living Clinical Practice Guideline.
Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major global health burden, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the primary revascularization strategy. However, complications such as no-reflow, reperfusion injury and in-stent restenosis persist, requiring adjunctive therapies. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), especially blood-activating and stasis-resolving Chinese patent medicine (CPM), is increasingly used in MI management. Objective: To develop a living clinical practice guideline for the perioperative use of CPMs in the perioperative period of PCI for MI, based on rigorous and transparent methodology. Methods: The guideline followed the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, methods for developing integrated Chinese-Western medicine guidelines, and the living guideline framework. It will be reported in accordance with the RIGHT-TCM extension. Clinical questions and outcomes were framed, selected and rated through structured discussions with the Guideline Steering Committee and the Guideline Development Group. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CPM. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach, and recommendations will be formulated via the Evidence-to-Decision framework, incorporating benefits, harms, evidence certainty, feasibility and costs. When new clinical studies are included and critical outcomes' combined effect demonstrates directional or magnitude changes, the consensus and guideline development groups will jointly decide on new updates. Conclusion: By addressing key clinical uncertainties and leveraging real-time evidence updates, the guideline aims to enhance patient outcomes and support clinicians in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.