ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2025
European Association of Endoscopic Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Protocol: Evidence-Informed Recommendations on the Management of Cholecystitis With ESAIC and ESR Participation.
Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several options exist for the management of acute cholecystitis. However, practice patterns vary widely, and there is a need for high-quality guidance in areas of controversy. Methods and Analysis: We will develop a clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with Tokyo Grades I-III acute cholecystitis. The guideline will answer the following key questions: 1.Should adult patients with Grades I or II acute cholecystitis receive conservative management or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy?2.Should adult patients with Grades II or III acute cholecystitis receive percutaneous drainage or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy?3.Should adult patients with Grades II or III acute cholecystitis receive conservative management or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy > 72 h from symptom onset? Our systematic review group will undertake multiple systematic reviews to identify articles addressing each key question. Next, we will appraise the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. An international, expert multidisciplinary panel will then meet to review the evidence and develop recommendations using GRADE's evidence-to-decision framework. This panel will consist of four general surgeons, an interventional radiologist, an intensive care specialist, an anaesthetist, and two patient representatives. Panel members will finalize our recommendations by consensus at an in-person meeting. This guideline will adhere to methodological standards according to GIN, GRADE and AGREE-S. Ethics and Dissemination: All participating members will declare their conflicts of interest, which will be addressed prior to guideline development. This clinical practice guideline will be presented at international scientific meetings, online presentations and social media, and published in full in the journal of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.