ArticleRespiratory research & clinical practice2026
Bronchial asthma: what is different in patients with and without chronic cough?
Article in Respiratory research & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Chronic cough (CC)-i.e., cough lasting for ≥ 8 weeks- is a common and burdensome symptom in asthma patients; however, its pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical relevance remain unclear. We sought to investigate clinical, functional, and inflammatory differences between asthma patients with chronic cough (ACC) and those without. (ANCC). Methods: We included 344 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma evaluated at a referral center from 2017 to 2024. Clinical data, lung function, inflammatory biomarkers, and health resource utilization were compared between ACC and ANCC. Further analyses stratifying patients by sputum eosinophil percentage (≥ 3% vs. < 3%) and CC were also performed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with chronic cough. Results: ACC (n = 124; 36%) had significantly worse asthma control (ACQ: p = 0.001), as well as higher number of exacerbations (p = 0.011), health care utilization, (p < 0.0001) and treatment dose of inhaled corticosteroids, (p = 0.004) when compared with ANCC. Despite similar lung function and inflammatory biomarkers, dyspnea, nocturnal symptoms, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale scores, and health care use were independently associated with CC. Further stratifications by sputum eosinophil percentage and CC revealed that ACC experienced a greater disease burden, regardless of whether sputum eosinophil percentage was ≥ 3% or < 3%. Conclusions: CC identifies a subgroup of asthma patients with poorer disease control, increased health care needs, and distinct clinical profiles, independently of airway inflammation. Routine recognition of cough as a symptom in asthma assessment may guide referral and personalized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.