ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Errate: Nasal Mucociliary Clearance and Its Relationship With Disease Severity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the published version of Figure 2, the bars representing the Ocrelizumab and Fingolimod treatment groups were inadvertently interchanged. The data presented in Table 2 and described in the Results section are correct. The corrected Figure 2 is provided to replace the originally published figure. Reference: Caner Baydar, Abdulaziz Yalınkılıç, Yaser Said Çetin. Nasal Mucociliary Clearance and Its Relationship With Disease Severity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Med Sci Monit. 2026; 32:e952850. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952850.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.