Observational studyBrain and behavior2026
The Factorial Structure of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale in Parents of Pediatric Surgical Patients: An Item Response Theory Analysis.
Observational study in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative anxiety is a common experience among patients undergoing surgery. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) is a short questionnaire designed to assess anxiety related to anesthesia and surgery, as well as patient's need for preoperative information (anesthesia and surgery). Despite its widespread use, comprehensive psychometric analyses using modern latent variable models remain limited.
methodsIn this cross-sectional psychometric analysis nested within a larger observational study, parents of children undergoing surgery answered the APAIS before their children's surgery. Responses were analyzed using item response theory (IRT) methods.
resultsOf the 477 parents who participated in the survey, 476 completed the APAIS. Participant's age ranged from 24 to 65 years (female: 76.1%). None of the tested models (one- to three-factor structures using different IRT-models) showed acceptable fit across all indices (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] < 0.08, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] ≥ 0.90, comparative fit index [CFI] ≥ 0.90). For the originally proposed factorial structure using a graded response model (RMSEA: 0.26, TLI: 0.82, CFI: 0.91), reliability was high (r > 0.8) for the middle area of -1.4 to +2.7 logits for anxiety and -1.4 to +1.8 logits for need for information. The magnitude of all statistically significant differential item functioning (DIF) effects was below the predefined threshold for clinical relevance.
conclusionsNone of the previously proposed factorial structures met the criteria for good model fit. The best-fitting model was the original two-factor structure, which showed poor model fit regarding RMSEA and acceptable model fit regarding CFI for all test models. TLI was acceptable for the partial credit model only. Further studies with larger sample sizes and the application of modern psychometric methods, such as IRT, are needed to clarify the factorial structure of the APAIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.