ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2026
Factors Associated With Biosecurity Preparedness for Foreign Animal Diseases Among Swine Farms in the United States Territory of Puerto Rico.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Biosecurity Preparedness for Foreign Animal Diseases Among Swine Farms in the United States Territory of Puerto Rico.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Successful responses to foreign animal diseases (FADs) such as African Swine Fever (ASF) in swine populations depend on the timely planning and implementation of effective biosecurity measures at the farm level. This study aimed to characterize biosecurity preparedness among swine farms in Puerto Rico and to identify geographic areas with higher biosecurity-related vulnerabilities across the island. Data were collected from 95 swine farms from seven regions using an adapted form of the enhanced biosecurity plan templates available from the Secure Pork Supply (SPS) Plan, a nationally recognized framework. Biosecurity scores were calculated using 37 captured variables related to biosecurity measures and transformed into a percentage. The overall average biosecurity score was 42.8% ± 4.5%. Lower regional-level biosecurity scores were observed in western regions. Although some operational practices, such as feed storage management and the use of dedicated vehicles and equipment, showed higher levels of adoption, critical components such as the availability of equipment necessary for depopulation and manure storage capacity to prevent the introduction and spread of highly relevant pathogens were often lacking, particularly regarding producer-level knowledge and preparedness. Overall, farms housing multiple species showed significantly lower biosecurity scores, while larger herd sizes being associated with higher biosecurity scores (p ≤ 0.05). These findings suggest that biosecurity implementation remains limited across many farms, particularly among multi-species and smaller-scale operations, highlighting the need for targeted and context-adapted biosecurity outreach and preparedness efforts in Puerto Rico, particularly in western regions located closer to ASF-endemic areas in the Caribbean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.